Austin Peay
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
2,073  Jessica Gray JR 22:39
2,353  Molly Jordan SO 22:57
2,560  Sarah-Emily Woodward FR 23:12
2,897  Rebecca Wheeler FR 23:45
3,128  Natalie Olberding JR 24:12
3,139  Unjula Lester SO 24:14
3,375  Sarah Carpenter FR 24:57
3,399  Aleiha Romero JR 25:03
3,636  Michaela McGhee FR 26:29
National Rank #289 of 341
South Region Rank #34 of 46
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 34th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Jessica Gray Molly Jordan Sarah-Emily Woodward Rebecca Wheeler Natalie Olberding Unjula Lester Sarah Carpenter Aleiha Romero Michaela McGhee
Foothills Invitational 10/04 1394 22:56 22:51 23:08 23:46 24:31 24:12 25:14 24:45 26:36
UE Invitational 10/18 1416 22:40 23:27 23:13 23:47 24:40 24:58 25:23 26:14
Ohio Valley Conference Championship 11/01 1368 22:16 22:48 23:15 23:41 23:50 24:00 24:29 25:04





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 33.9 1034 0.0 0.2



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Jessica Gray 169.8
Molly Jordan 189.6
Sarah-Emily Woodward 204.9
Rebecca Wheeler 228.0
Natalie Olberding 245.9
Unjula Lester 247.2
Sarah Carpenter 261.9




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 0.0% 0.0 30
31 0.2% 0.2 31
32 0.8% 0.8 32
33 4.7% 4.7 33
34 93.8% 93.8 34
35 0.4% 0.4 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0